But I kind of agree with him with respect to the art of writing. I would say that I am a person who enjoys creative writing, but no matter how great I think my own writing is (which, by the way, I don’t), and no matter how great someone else thinks my writing is (mostly my mother), I will never consider myself a writer until someone in the “literary world” publishes my work.
Now, this doesn’t mean I think that everything published by publishing companies is worth reading or that all of those authors should be considered good writers either, or that some unpublished people may not be far superior writers, but I feel like I do not personally have the right to confer that title upon myself. I just think of myself as a person who participates in the act of writing. At what point can a person feel justified in calling themselves “a writer” as opposed to just “a person who writes?” Is there a difference between being a writer and being a Writer?
I quoted your blog here: http://www.8secondsofawesome.com/post/11570360968/a-girl-in-our-class-said-she-had-a-painting-on
ReplyDeleteAnd did a blog post on the quoting of your blog, here: http://www.8secondsofawesome.com/post/11571047961/posting-to-tumblr
Your professor sounds hilariously pretentious (which I do mean as a compliment). I love his comment about the food. I also liked your introspective post, and like David I quoted your blog on my blog and then blogged about it.
ReplyDeletei will join this blog party as well! I agree he sounds really pretentious haha. I think the closer to food, the closer it is to art. Because ancient peoples/ anglo-saxons/ others probably told most stories around dinner time (i have no source for this claim).
ReplyDeleteMy response: http://www.8secondsofawesome.com/post/11748174888/writing-is-an-action
ReplyDelete